|
|
Post by ForNoone on May 6, 2005 11:35:19 GMT -5
I don't see him as being Pete. The features don't match up.
|
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 8, 2005 19:28:54 GMT -5
Heh, cool. But if you actually make an overlay/fade of the 2 pics, what's going on with the jaw/chin? |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 9, 2005 1:49:37 GMT -5
 Just a question... who is the boy on the right? "Tube Head Boy" perhaps? |
|
|
|
Post by sneaKIN on May 9, 2005 3:14:46 GMT -5
Isn't that John Lennon on the right?
A smashed together picture.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 9, 2005 6:00:53 GMT -5
SURELY NOT the same man at all! |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 9, 2005 14:49:22 GMT -5
I really don't know if it's Pete Shotton. There have been some facial inconsistencies.
Anyway, my question on the jaw remains unanswered.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 9, 2005 14:53:44 GMT -5
I really don't know if it's Pete Shotton. There have been some facial inconsistencies. Anyway, my question on the jaw remains unanswered. FP... just pumping up more with the filler ... it's simple. Intelligence expert has just told me that was not a "normal" filler .... A substance close to the insect poison... allergenic.. |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 9, 2005 14:59:49 GMT -5
FP... just pumping up more with the filler ... it's simple. Intelligence expert as just told me that was not a "normal" filler .... A substance close to the insect poison... allergenic.. Can you give me an example of how an injection (any kind) can make your jaw wider? |
|
|
|
Post by NWO on May 9, 2005 18:49:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 9, 2005 19:39:39 GMT -5
You think you can show me a comparison from the front of the face, before and after?
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 10, 2005 3:05:04 GMT -5
An example from the same Faul. BTW |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 10, 2005 16:29:01 GMT -5
Athenias, what's going on? Why are my posts getting deleted?
|
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on May 10, 2005 16:56:34 GMT -5
Athenias, what's going on? Why are my posts getting deleted? Someone asked you a question that was irrelevant to the topic of this thread. I deleted that, and your reply to it, because your reply made no sense without the original question. It's not personal, just editing. BTW...there's nothing wrong with asking questions here, but there needs to be a balance between asking and sharing. If a poster has many questions and not much useful information to share, it can become a burden on other forum members to try to keep that person up to speed. |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 10, 2005 17:10:37 GMT -5
Someone asked you a question that was irrelevant to the topic of this thread. I deleted that, and your reply to it, because your reply made no sense without the original question. It's not personal, just editing. BTW...there's nothing wrong with asking questions here, but there needs to be a balance between asking and sharing. If a poster has many questions and not much useful information to share, it can become a burden on other forum members to try to keep that person up to speed. Ah, okay. Thanks for the reply. Are you saying you want me to share "useful information"? I'm a PIAer as you know, and I know you don't me to debate on whether he was replaced or not (which I respect). So how can I "share useful information"? Anyway, Nic, where did you get the pic on the left from? It always looked pretty weird to me. |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 10, 2005 17:15:05 GMT -5
Anyway, Nic, where did you get the pic on the left from? It always looked pretty weird to me. A friend posted it. But it's not so "pretty weird" because it's THE SAME "Faul" of the famous LSD interview...  Ah, okay. Thanks for the reply. Are you saying you want me to share "useful information"? I'm a PIAer as you know, and I know you don't me to debate on whether he was replaced or not (which I respect). So how can I "share useful information"? At least you are a sincere troll....  |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 10, 2005 17:24:20 GMT -5
But where did "your friend" get it from? Where was it taken? IMO, it still looks weird, even next to the LSD interview pic.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 10, 2005 17:53:39 GMT -5
But where did "your friend" get it from? Where was it taken? IMO, it still looks weird, even next to the LSD interview pic. Why weird? He looks just the same.... Ah...it's about B/W vs. colour photo.... now I understand... |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 10, 2005 18:17:00 GMT -5
Why weird? He looks just the same.... Ah...it's about B/W vs. colour photo.... now I understand... Actually, it's the nose, and chin shape. Actually pretty much everything looks pointier in that pic. |
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on May 10, 2005 18:34:41 GMT -5
Ah, okay. Thanks for the reply. Are you saying you want me to share "useful information"? I'm a PIAer as you know, and I know you don't me to debate on whether he was replaced or not (which I respect). So how can I "share useful information"? Ah, well, if you have a PIA mindset, you probably can't share much that is useful. You do have good questions, but this is not really a "questions and answers" forum, so much as a "sharing information" forum. What I'm saying is, please keep your questions to a minimum. Think about the most important ones and post those, and be aware of staying on topic. Thanks. |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 10, 2005 19:24:38 GMT -5
Got it.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 11, 2005 4:47:50 GMT -5
Actually, it's the nose, and chin shape. Actually pretty much everything looks pointier in that pic. You are right and that is a proof. About weird nose...  |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 11, 2005 15:23:39 GMT -5
I don't see how that's proof of anything and I don't know what you're trying to say either. Can you just tell me where you or your "friend" got the pic from?
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 11, 2005 17:10:35 GMT -5
Next time I'll meet him I'll ask him.
|
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 11, 2005 17:37:55 GMT -5
Next time I'll meet him I'll ask him. If you don't know about the picture, how do you know it's 'reliable'? |
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on May 11, 2005 18:21:54 GMT -5
Yes? And you are still asking the same questions... You aren't contributing anything positive here so...bye...  |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 12, 2005 5:08:01 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lovelyrita on May 12, 2005 9:35:44 GMT -5
I have been examining various photos of Faul throughout the years and I am beginning to think that there are two Fauls. The one with the long thin face, and then there is a fuller faced Faul, no arched eyebrows, who seemed to appear in the early 70's. I have seen some with a beard and a couple without and he has a wider face, it doesn't look like the "filler" pics of Faul(long face) If you go to this page and look at the first pic of Faul with flowers around him, he looks different from the Faul Longface. fortunecity.com/tinpan/mccartney/639/photos60.htmlAlso looking at the pics Nicolas posted, the b/w full bodied shot of Faul, his face looks fuller, but not filler/chipmunk looking and his eyebrows aren't arched either. I don't know if during the early 70's Faul Longface was heavier and his face was fuller, but not looking like the fillerface like the Hey Jude pics, but there are some with the beard and without that looks like different man. Faul longface seems to have tweezed his eyebrows in the later years, but regardless, some of these early 70's pics the eyebrows seem different too. Like the pic in the White Album poster that has Faul and then only half of another Mc Cartney looking face, could this be that at the time we had Faul I (Longface) and then the backup Faul was only half completed in his transformation? (On one of the posts someone added a picture of Denny Laine to fill it in.) Oh, the questions, but how many Fauls? hmmm |
|
|
|
Post by Eye Browse on May 12, 2005 23:02:43 GMT -5
If you gave the massive, and I mean MASSIVE quantity of Sir Paul McCartney pictures early late before after etc, to an artist and asked for just ONE portrait, I think he would be faced with a dilemma or two!
We have seen to date since the beginning of this madness that
there's a lot of variation to contend with.
I am with you, in that, somehow, there is amidst the barrage of images, a possible third look-a-like who looks, well, sort of "in-between" the, well, er, uhm, "other two."
So, who is the most "Paulist"? And which image is the most "Faulist"? And how many were there? And what about those famous arched eyebrows? Did he pluck? Did he use tweezers?
Who can tell? I sure can't. Cause....
I can't see the "Faulist" for the tweeze.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 13, 2005 8:24:05 GMT -5
Are you saying you want me to share "useful information"? I'm a PIAer as you know, and I know you don't me to debate on whether he was replaced or not (which I respect). So how can I "share useful information"? How sad... FP now you seem "trapped" in your own "role"... But I really have to say "thank you" since you have enlighten us about Bill/Viv. Sincerely. |
|
|
|
Post by lovelyrita on May 14, 2005 22:40:11 GMT -5
Faulist....that's a good one  so many imitations, but never a genuine duplicate It can confuse one if you haven't kept track of them all. |
|
so many imitations, but never a genuine duplicate