|
|
Post by nicolas on Apr 30, 2005 19:16:35 GMT -5
  The same eyes. And what about the teeth very "Paul" like? Viv and let die. |
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on Apr 30, 2005 19:31:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on Apr 30, 2005 19:33:35 GMT -5
  ...just ONLY an hair colour change... |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on Apr 30, 2005 19:34:48 GMT -5
Liposculpture procedure.
This is the scientific answer for all that.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on Apr 30, 2005 19:39:16 GMT -5
  ...and what about feet... |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on Apr 30, 2005 19:44:58 GMT -5
Well now I can understand WHY at the end of Magical Mystery Tour the "Love the 3 Beatles" ONLY AFTER visiting Viv on work were all together again for "Your Mother Should Know" song.
AHHHHHH Now ALL is CLEAR!!!
AT LAST!
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on Apr 30, 2005 19:47:12 GMT -5
Post Scriptum The first clone experiment? |
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on Apr 30, 2005 19:58:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on Apr 30, 2005 21:57:12 GMT -5
  Yes the resemblance is incredible! Clearly father and son. |
|
|
|
Post by LibertyX on May 1, 2005 0:52:03 GMT -5
I don't quite follow what this all means. Has Viv always been Billy? Was there never a real Viv?  |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 1, 2005 5:44:23 GMT -5
I don't quite follow what this all means. Has Viv always been Billy? Was there never a real Viv? This is the point. Did Bill replaced a "previous" Vivian (a la Maritza Sannia -Miss WinterS-) or he was just Vivian? Odd things in Vivian's chronology:  This picture is dated early Sixties. Officially Vivian born in 1943 a year AFTER James Paul McCartney. Possible? I think: NO! |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 1, 2005 5:51:42 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 1, 2005 6:54:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on May 1, 2005 11:55:24 GMT -5
  Vivian 1968 <-------------------------------------> Vivian 1969 Different eyes, nose, chin, jaw bone, face width, etc, etc, etc... |
|
|
|
Post by Sane on May 1, 2005 17:24:34 GMT -5
In what way are his eyes (or anything else for that matter) different?  |
|
|
|
Post by totalinfo on May 1, 2005 17:31:01 GMT -5
This guy has also been suggested as being James Louis' father. Linda got around...  |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 1, 2005 17:54:05 GMT -5
This guy has also been suggested as being James Louis' father. Linda got around...  You decide. |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 1, 2005 18:09:53 GMT -5
This guy has also been suggested as being James Louis' father. Linda got around... Uh, wondering, how did Stephen Stills get involved in this? |
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on May 1, 2005 18:18:06 GMT -5
In what way are his eyes (or anything else for that matter) different? The second man's nose is wider and his nostrils flare differently. Watch the eyebrows moving too in your fade...up and down...up and down... But the eyes are the windows of the soul... And the windowshade (eyelids) is a dead giveaway. The same eyes (and the same surgically reconstructed eyelids) |
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on May 1, 2005 18:19:26 GMT -5
Uh, wondering, how did Stephen Stills get involved in this? I was wondering that too. |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 1, 2005 18:24:58 GMT -5
The second man's nose is wider and his nostrils flare differently. Watch the eyebrows moving too in your fade...up and down...up and down... But the eyes are the windows of the soul... And the windowshade (eyelids) is a dead giveaway. The same eyes (and the same surgically reconstructed eyelids) Actually, it's my fade. And: 1: In the glasses pic, his face is leaning back more, so the bottom half of the face is going to look slightly closer (because it is). 2: He's smiling in the glasses pic, so his nostrils are going to be higher. 3: My mistake, I forgot that people can't move their eyebrows. 4: The eyes look the same too me. |
|
|
|
Post by revolver on May 1, 2005 18:25:20 GMT -5
Just pointing on the jawbone limits with the mouse arrow... Even I must disagree here. Due to the angles being off, the jaw's going to move. I'll look for more pictures that will support the Viv is Faul cause, but that fade seems accurate enough... for now. |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 1, 2005 18:40:04 GMT -5
Vivian Stanshall.
It's hard to believe but Vivian is to be heard on one of the most popular albums of all time - Tubular Bells. Yes, it's him introducing the instruments leading up to the actual banging of those chrome tube like things.
To many, Stanshall was the ultimate English eccentric. His career started in 1966 with the much loved Bonzo Dog Doo Dah Band who limped through several gifted but uncommercial releases before teaming up with Paul McCartney (using the psuedonym, Apollo C. Vermouth) as producer and hitting the charts with "I'm The Urban Spaceman". The group's mixture of rock parodies and satire ensured them a warm place in the hearts and minds of the college rock circuit.
Commercial success may have eluded Stanshall after the break up of the Bonzos in the early '70s but the scale of his vision can be seen to the full on "Sir Henry At Rawlinson End" a stunning parody of the English upper class which was turned into a film with Trevor Howard in the title role.
The eccentricity much loved by fans was a symptom of a much deeper mental instability which had taken its toll over the years. However, he seemed once again to be well and charting life as he saw it. Although his output had been erratic over the years to say the least, he had completed a new body of work which had been aired on BBC-2's "The Late Show" prior to his death.
Taken from: www.rockmine.music.co.uk/Reaper.htmlIs that the "official" Viv's chronology? If yes I could have a BIG laugh because....
|
|
|
|
Post by SF on May 1, 2005 18:41:45 GMT -5
Isn't this kind of silly? How many people are Faul? George Martin, Vivian Stanshall, Billy Shephard/Shears, William Campbell, the guy on the bus, whoever that guy is from the Pepperpots or whatever, etc. How many different people can it be?
Also, that fade is fine. It doesn't have to be a perfect match to be the same guy. There is no difference there.
|
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 1, 2005 18:57:42 GMT -5
 Expert, texpert choking smokers
don't you think the joker laughs at you
 |
|
|
|
Post by revolver on May 1, 2005 19:04:10 GMT -5
Expert, texpert choking smokers
don't you think the joker laughs at you
Yes, those definitely aren't Paul's or Billy's teeth, though. We need to find other pictures that suit only our arguments. |
|
|
|
Post by Athenais on May 1, 2005 19:07:51 GMT -5
Isn't this kind of silly? How many people are Faul? George Martin, Vivian Stanshall, Billy Shephard/Shears, William Campbell, the guy on the bus, whoever that guy is from the Pepperpots or whatever, etc. How many different people can it be? Also, that fade is fine. It doesn't have to be a perfect match to be the same guy. There is no difference there. "Faul" is one person as far as I know, but he is a brilliant impersonator. He really has a great talent for imitating so many different people. |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 1, 2005 19:10:42 GMT -5
Isn't this kind of silly? How many people are Faul? George Martin, Vivian Stanshall, Billy Shephard/Shears, William Campbell, the guy on the bus, whoever that guy is from the Pepperpots or whatever, etc. How many different people can it be? Also, that fade is fine. It doesn't have to be a perfect match to be the same guy. There is no difference there. Interesting. Who told that? |
|
|
|
Post by FP on May 1, 2005 19:17:11 GMT -5
 Make you own conclusions. |
|
|
|
Post by nicolas on May 1, 2005 19:22:45 GMT -5
Here you can see my conclusion. |
|
) Sgt. Pepper booklet is about a pantomime.
